Conversations, Facinations Pt.2

1.Alpha
2.Beta
3.Omega/Zeta

Which would you subscribe to?

Which would you define yourself as?

Let's explore the depths of Dbl Edge's mind.

Part two of C/F explores the archetypes of the status roles in both male and female counterparts (please note the generalising as this piece is being broadcasted rather than specified):

The alpha male in today's times carries themselves with a certain sense of direction. The classical caveman-esque way of old has been made redundant in favour of a male who "just gets it".

We are raised in British culture to confirm to a blend of the chivalrous, yet assertive man. However some focus groups would prefer that the assertion were to be eradicated.

What does this leave?
A male who has no spine. One who will do that which is unnatural to him and to the woman he courts.

And what does this lead to?
The man being disrespected for not defaulting to his instincts. Constant berating and testing, emasculation, random spats of abstinence in the agreement, you name it.

I always had an interesting perspective on this during my teens, as I found that being "RAGGO", meant that I could achieve my objectives, but still remained in touch with honesty and minute levels of compassion. By confirming consent of manipulation, you are in essence asking that the woman agrees for you to put her mind in your employ.